• All my experience is with IMR 4198 and Ramshot TAC. TAC flowed and metered somewhat better, but 4198 grouped much better, shot softer and still left the gun cleaner. And
I checked out Hogdon's relative burn up fee chart & H335 appears for being a great deal faster than CFE. Varget and BL-C2 appear to be much like CFE with regards to burn up rate.
I might loaded up the last of my 30 moreover year previous BLC2 powder can awhile back again just to eliminate the powder. I used a load that was a lot less than the guide's mentioned manual and place the rounds around the shelf. I shot a number of them in my new AR15 Establish a few vary excursions again and obtained the ideal loads this rifle has shot thus far. I ended because of the gun keep on the best way dwelling and acquired a pound of BLC2 to deliver house and load up some more to see if The brand new powder operates/shoots along with the over thirty year outdated powder shoots. My son like H335. It provides him the most beneficial groups in his AR15 and exactly the same loads seem to shoot good groups in his Savage varmint rifle, too.
You can obtain a definitive answer within the fellas at Barnes way too when you shoot them an email. They seem to be a great bunch of folks to talk with no matter if by e mail or maybe on the mobile phone.
It is usually proposed to start with “get started” loads and operate up carefully to highest fees while thoroughly awaiting indications of surplus stress. The .308 Winchester can Construct pressures instead rapidly, so this warning really should not be taken flippantly. A load that exhibits totally normal pressures, or pressures which have been inside sector tips, can soar swiftly above advisable degrees with the addition of only one or two grains of powder (or by switching situation models or even whole lot quantities).
Burn off fee charts are certainly not for powder substitutions, but are for exhibiting the differences of melt away fee among powders.
This can be an more mature thread, you may not get a reaction, and will be reviving an outdated thread. Be sure to look at making a new thread.
All RifleShooter subscribers now have digital use of their journal information. This means you've got the choice to browse your journal on most widely used telephones and tablets.
Lots of .223 shooters have burned a great deal of H335, for the website reason that for very some time it absolutely was among the higher ball powders available for the job. It metered effectively from the powder evaluate and typically shot fairly precisely.
Have generally listened to that 335 metered wonderful. Do TAC and Benchmark behave just as very well from the powder thrower? To the file I just acquired a pound of Benchmark but it was a straightforward alternative, only 223 suitable powder I could locate local.
Sign up for the special reloading Neighborhood Started in 1996 and become the initial to find out about our most recent news, reviews, and insights.
Posts: three,881 I possess the data in my reloading guide, I was just inquiring if anyone had compared both equally powders. Like I mentioned I can't manage to get H335 to shoot as exact and CFE223. rebs
I've look at this persistently. I basically sold off an unopened 8# jug of H335 final yr and was in a position to acquire 14# of SW Tactical Rifle with what I sold it for. I also purchased eight# of AR Additionally before I purchased the Tactical because I examine it was comparable to H335.
My Most loved accurate load for 223 is H322 with 55gr V-max Or BIB bullets if I am definitely wanting to shoot. I like the way CFE223 meters and shoots very properly but H322 is much more exact for me.